Ban the Automatic Sensors!
Envirolet® Buzz reports that a community college in Washington has saved almost 200,000 gallons of water simply by replacing automatic flush sensors with a push button flush system. Envirolet® Buzz would prefer a waterless toilets or composting toilets be installed, but acknowledges that anything that saves water is a positive move.
Via Envirolet® Buzz via Heraldnet.
College flush with saved water
'Some students were beginning to wonder if the toilets at Cascadia Community College were possessed.
Sanitary seat covers would be whisked away before one could use them. Slight movements would spark premature flushes. And the blame couldn't be pinned solely on a full moon. A black sweater would be enough to set the toilet whooshing.
'Even if there's no one in the stall, they'll go off - just walking past,' said student Kristen Bell, 17. 'It's just unnecessary.'
Cascadia administrators agreed and turned off the automatic sensors, urging students and staff to instead push a button to flush toilets.
A year later, the 'Push to Flush' campaign has saved more than the frazzled nerves of many posteriors.
Over an eight-month period starting in May 2004, the college saved 177,276 gallons of water compared with the same period in 2003, according to water bills.
At 1.6 gallons per flush, that's 110,797 fewer bowls of water down the drain, enough to run the Cascadia campus for two-and-a-half months, or seven households for a year.'
Via Envirolet® Buzz via Heraldnet.








3 Comments. Add your comments!
Note, that in Canada you rarely find the sanitary seat covers like in the US. Good for the environment, not always good for the user.
By Scott, at 11:29 AM, April 19, 2005
It's amazing how a "little" thing like that can make such a big difference. Good for Cascadia Community College.
By Nathan, at 1:34 PM, April 19, 2005
For the longest time I have had a grudge against said "Automatic" flushers. There seems to be some myth that they are water savers ant/or sanitary. My experience with them has at least proven that they do NOT save water. I am quite sure that sitting on a toilet and having it flush 2-3 times is anything BUT sanitary. But YOU search on the internet and find this topic. You will find scant written on this. Why? Because each of us feels in some way as if the multiple flushes are in some way our fault. That, and it is not a very P.C. thing to talk about. So, the automatic toilet flushing industry keeps on replacing more and more human flushers with stupid auto flushers that waste more and more water. Go figure. You really would think that the makers of these devices would test them more realistically, or at LEAST market them with truth - your water bill will rise quite a bit after you install all these expensive and unsanitary devices. Oh well... I guess I will need to learn how to not fidget on the toilet seat in order to save on water consumption!!
By Tom Schmidt, at 12:14 PM, October 24, 2005
Post a Comment
<< Home